Difference between r1.19 and the current
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
일대일대응,one-to-one_correspondence 과 완전 동일한 뜻? chk
[[일대일대응,one-to-one_correspondence]]과 완전 동일한 뜻? chk
see https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/One-to-one_correspondence Yes, wpen 처음문장 "In mathematics, a bijection, also known as a bijective function, one-to-one correspondence, or invertible function, is..."
함수가 injection and surjection 두 조건을 만족시키면 바로 이것? chk - Yes. "A bijection is a function that is both one-to-one and onto."
@@ -7,6 +8,9 @@
[[전사,surjection]] [[전사함수,surjective_function]][[단사,injection]] [[단사함수,injective_function]]
'''전단사,bijection''' [[전단사함수,bijective_function]]
WtEn:bijection
'''bijective''' adj.
curr. see: [[함수,function#s-5]] and/or [[사상,map]]
@@ -20,6 +24,7 @@
http://foldoc.org/bijectionhttps://everything2.com/title/bijection
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Bijection
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bijection
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Bijective_function
보면 [[가역함수,invertible_function]]{ writing; rel. [[역함수,inverse_function]] }와 동의어로 취급
@@ -35,4 +40,9 @@
[[equipotent_set]]두 equipotent sets는 서로 '''전단사''' 관계가 존재하는 sets? chk
[[equipotence]] WtEn:equipotence Bing:equipotence
[[equinumerosity]] WtEn:equinumerosity Bing:equinumerosity
'''bijection''' 개념의 일반화는 [[동형사상,isomorphism]]? chk
일대일대응,one-to-one_correspondence과 완전 동일한 뜻? chk
see https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/One-to-one_correspondence
Yes, wpen 처음문장 "In mathematics, a bijection, also known as a bijective function, one-to-one correspondence, or invertible function, is..."
함수가 injection and surjection 두 조건을 만족시키면 바로 이것? chk - Yes. "A bijection is a function that is both one-to-one and onto."Yes, wpen 처음문장 "In mathematics, a bijection, also known as a bijective function, one-to-one correspondence, or invertible function, is..."
For
전사,surjection 전사함수,surjective_function
단사,injection 단사함수,injective_function
전단사,bijection 전단사함수,bijective_function
전사,surjection 전사함수,surjective_function
단사,injection 단사함수,injective_function
전단사,bijection 전단사함수,bijective_function
https://encyclopediaofmath.org/wiki/Bijection
https://planetmath.org/bijection
https://everything2.com/title/bijection
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Bijection
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bijection
https://planetmath.org/bijection
//planetmath
이고 가 전단사이면, 를 의 permutation이라고 부른다.
이건 순열,permutation보다는 치환,permutation이라는 번역이 어울릴 지? 아님 상관 없나?
http://foldoc.org/bijection이고 가 전단사이면, 를 의 permutation이라고 부른다.
이건 순열,permutation보다는 치환,permutation이라는 번역이 어울릴 지? 아님 상관 없나?
https://everything2.com/title/bijection
https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Bijection
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bijection
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Bijective_function
보면 가역함수,invertible_function{ writing; rel. 역함수,inverse_function }와 동의어로 취급
집합 X에서 자기 자신으로의 bijective_function은 also called: a permutation of the set X. - 순열,permutation? 치환,permutation?
chk
집합 X에서 자기 자신으로의 bijective_function은 also called: a permutation of the set X. - 순열,permutation? 치환,permutation?
chk
mklink
invertibility(작성중. 가역성?)과 밀접.
equipotent_set
equipotent_set
두 equipotent sets는 서로 전단사 관계가 존재하는 sets? chk
equipotence equipotence equipotencebijection 개념의 일반화는 동형사상,isomorphism? chk